A Secret Weapon For h4831sc
A Secret Weapon For h4831sc
Blog Article
Due to the fact there won't seem like any "Formal" Load Data to choose from for this Load, can a number of you offer a place to begin with this mixture and points to consider when Doing the job this Load up?
H4831 will function during the Swift but not true nicely. You'll hardly ever receive the pressures you may need for regularity with the .223. 760, or H414 is going to be improved but for a few motive I ain't the most significant fan of most ball powders.
This is amongst the greatest explanations reloaders are admonished to make use of new data only; and to get started on very low each and every time you receive a completely new lots of powder. You do not truly know (Except the business tells you so) that the new lot of powder was even designed at a similar manufacturing facility given that the powder you acquire a number of years in the past.
While using the 154 grain Hornady SP within the 280, H4831 gave me very good teams and great velocity, but Rottweil R905 includes a appreciably bigger velocity and provides marginally much better accuracy. With Swift a hundred and fifty grain Sciroccos during the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave great precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally greater. As a result, in each of those circumstances I went with another powder, but I would certainly hate to divest myself from the H4831.
Alaska The sc loads up a tad much better but These are the exact same thing, just one is just limited cut. I’ve even combined the traditional 1 Along with the SC and gotten the exact same outcomes as applying 1 or another.
Because there would not seem like any "official" Load Data to choose from for this Load, can a number of you supply a starting point with this mix and things to consider when Functioning this Load up?
I'm employing it using a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as exact. h4831 vs h4831sc RL22 did effectively but I used to be a little concerned about temp security. I do think I am at 72 grains and acquire around 2850ish fps
Anyhow, I planned to give some 7828SC a try and lessen many of the compression. What a mistake, I couldn't get this powder to shoot accurately or produce the velocities I get with normal 7828.
WA I'd personally propose a slower burner that could give superior scenario density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly if you're loading heavies long.
Ballistically, this Extreme Extruded powder is the precise copy of H4831. Physically, it's a shorter grain dimension, hence, the designation SC or short Slash. The shorter, additional compact kernels allow the powder to h4831sc move in the powder steps far more smoothly, assisting to relieve the continual slicing of granules.
Kansas City, MO I would seize whichever is available right now. I’ve used both of those nevertheless with my drop h4831sc load data by load and didn’t see just about anything unique effectiveness wise.
It is really likely that no more discussion is required, during which scenario we suggest commencing a whole new thread. If on the other hand you really feel your reaction is needed it is possible to however do this.
I typically normally have the sc Variation. Employing a powder evaluate it hangs up a lot less as a consequence of shorter kernels and I think will allow extra dependable metering so fewer time you are taking trickling in the last bit of cost to make fat. So basically the SC saves you periods
The reality that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is specifically why you're seeing greater velocities acquired with that powder, rather than That which you've found with the IMR stuff.